<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Acceleration in Accountability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.summary.com/2010/02/24/an-acceleration-in-accountability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.summary.com/2010/02/24/an-acceleration-in-accountability/</link>
	<description>Editor&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soundview</title>
		<link>http://blog.summary.com/2010/02/24/an-acceleration-in-accountability/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Soundview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundviewsummary.wordpress.com/?p=1029#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve definitely encountered ideas similar to yours as I search around the blogosphere. While you raise some interesting points that will no doubt cause many to agree or disagree accordingly, I can&#039;t verify any of the information.

I keep my blog non-political because it&#039;s centered on business books. Still, raising the questions you raise is an important part of the operation of a free society, and I&#039;m glad you wrote to us.

What interests me in the Toyota controversy is whether or not it will change the company&#039;s accountability practices. One of the reasons we selected &lt;em&gt;How Did That Happen&lt;/em&gt; for summary is that accountability practices are either soft or reactionary and the authors of the book provide a program that is proactive and positive. Toyota has an opportunity to change its practices and return to a better standing with its consumers. Only time will tell if this will occur.

Thanks for reading!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve definitely encountered ideas similar to yours as I search around the blogosphere. While you raise some interesting points that will no doubt cause many to agree or disagree accordingly, I can&#8217;t verify any of the information.</p>
<p>I keep my blog non-political because it&#8217;s centered on business books. Still, raising the questions you raise is an important part of the operation of a free society, and I&#8217;m glad you wrote to us.</p>
<p>What interests me in the Toyota controversy is whether or not it will change the company&#8217;s accountability practices. One of the reasons we selected <em>How Did That Happen</em> for summary is that accountability practices are either soft or reactionary and the authors of the book provide a program that is proactive and positive. Toyota has an opportunity to change its practices and return to a better standing with its consumers. Only time will tell if this will occur.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Edgewater</title>
		<link>http://blog.summary.com/2010/02/24/an-acceleration-in-accountability/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Edgewater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundviewsummary.wordpress.com/?p=1029#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toyota is being tarred and feathered by the U.S. government because G.M. and Chrysler are owned by the U.S. government and the UAW.  Since GM and Chrysler are now in a position to never have to show a profit again (as they are just two more bottomless-pit-government agencies, artificially propped up by tax payer monies), it&#039;s curious that this witch hunt is taking place at all.  The only reason can be is that Toyota doesn&#039;t hire UAW &quot;talent&quot;, which is one of many reasons it took over GM as the world&#039;s number one automaker.  The UAW is trying to unionize Toyota UAW style, so that they can destroy that automaker as well.  
I submit that there is NOT a mechanical problem with Toyotas-brakes or otherwise-and that these charges are all a nefarious fabrications for compulsory concessions by Toyota to the Feds and the UAW.  You heard it here first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota is being tarred and feathered by the U.S. government because G.M. and Chrysler are owned by the U.S. government and the UAW.  Since GM and Chrysler are now in a position to never have to show a profit again (as they are just two more bottomless-pit-government agencies, artificially propped up by tax payer monies), it&#8217;s curious that this witch hunt is taking place at all.  The only reason can be is that Toyota doesn&#8217;t hire UAW &#8220;talent&#8221;, which is one of many reasons it took over GM as the world&#8217;s number one automaker.  The UAW is trying to unionize Toyota UAW style, so that they can destroy that automaker as well.<br />
I submit that there is NOT a mechanical problem with Toyotas-brakes or otherwise-and that these charges are all a nefarious fabrications for compulsory concessions by Toyota to the Feds and the UAW.  You heard it here first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
